Dog World news archive - February 2012

Compulsory microchipping for council tenants’ dogs

27 Nov 2008 08:02

This article has 7 Comment(s)

A LONDON council has become the first in the country to introduce a compulsory microchipping scheme.
The new scheme means that all of Wandsworth council’s tenants have to microchip their dogs as part of their housing regulations. Those who refuse will face eviction.
The scheme is being backed by the RSPCA, which believes it will be an important test case in finding out if chipping can be used successfully in the fight against anti-social behaviour.
Subject to consultation, the new regulations will apply to all tenants from early next year, although no enforcement action will be taken against existing tenants for a few months to give them time to get their animals chipped.
The free service will also be offered to all leaseholders and their sub-tenants in council-owned blocks and estates.
This will increase the scheme’s effectiveness, the authority believes.
It is estimated that 4,000 dogs live on the borough’s estates.
“Recording ownership details on a database will help the council deal quickly with strays and take action against tenants who allow their dogs to cause a nuisance,” a council spokesman said.
“We have been encouraging dog owners to microchip their animals for a long time, and we run regular microchipping sessions.

Control measures


“We have been at the forefront of dog control measures, and have the largest local authority dog control service in the country.
“Our wardens pick up any stray dog they find and check to see if it has been chipped. If it has, it is then returned to its owner.”
The RSPCA said it would be keeping a close eye on Wandsworth’s new rules.
“Microchipping is something we have supported for quite some time,” a spokesman said.
“We know it’s useful for returning dogs to their owners, but we’ve never been able to assess how useful it is in terms of anti-social behaviour.
“Wandsworth will give us some key data and will allow us to convince other local authorities that this approach does work.
“This is the first time there’s been a large-scale, compulsory microchipping scheme, and we’re fully supportive of this measure.”
London Mayor Boris Johnson is worried about what the Metropolitan Police say has been an increase in dog attacks.
At Mayor’s Question Time recently Mr Johnson called it ‘a very worrying vogue’, and said the problem should be ‘raised on the political agenda’.
He has agreed to help set up a Greater London Authority action plan.
“It is scary for people who find these dogs intimidating, and in many cases it can be tragic for the dogs themselves,” he said.

You need to login to add your comment. Already registered? Log in now! Not registered? Register now!

    1

    Think there may be a test case here for owners to sue the council for any health issues that arise from any microchipping health problem. There is evidence showing microchip sites cancer increases, they are on very dodgy ground indeed

    Posted at 18:47 on 27 Nov 2008 by
    Fifi | Report as inappropriate

    2

    I'm in Australia and it's in my State Law that breeders must microchip dogs and cats BEFORE selling or giving them away, heavy fines apply to those who do not comply to this State Law. A special registry had been setup and kept for any problems or adverse effects from microchips, and after some years with huge quantities of dogs and cats already been microchipped and according to the register it is very rare indeed to see any sort of health problems or adverse effects or even cancer. Thanks to microchips heaps of dogs and cats have been quickly identified and reunited with their human companions. Interestingly when pet owners apply for local dog licenses they must provide the microchip number and via this Animal Control Officers know who the breeder was, and if the dog was not microchipped the Animal Control Officer will ask the pet owner where they got their dog from and that heavy fines could be applied.

    Posted at 00:42 on 28 Nov 2008 by
    Quincy | Report as inappropriate

    3

    Is this the thin end of the wedge for compulsary microchipping? Also it seems that this may be targeting council and housing association tennants as being irresponsible owners, verging on the criminal! Eviction for failing to microchip a pet dog, seems to me to be flying in the face of the governments concerns that in the current financial situation people should not be evicted from their homes. Every concerned tennant should contact their MP about this.

    Posted at 19:06 on 30 Nov 2008 by
    Pauline | Report as inappropriate

    4

    Regarding "every concerned tennant" I read the Wandsworth Council website and it mentioned this: "Around 17,000 letters were sent out to tenants formally notifying them about the proposed micro-chipping scheme, BUT NOBODY WHO RESPONDED OPPOSED IT. The new rules will mean that, subject to final approval from the council's Executive, all new tenants must have their animals chipped as part of their tenancy agreement. The rules will apply to new tenants from January 5. Existing tenants will have until June, a year after the scheme was first announced, to get their pet chipped before enforcement action is taken. Micro-chipping will also be offered FREE-OF-CHARGE to tenants and leaseholders. To have your animal chipped for free, go along to Danebury Avenue near the library any time between 11am and 3pm. Further free sessions will be held elsewhere in the borough over the next few weeks."

    Posted at 02:22 on 02 Dec 2008 by
    Quincy | Report as inappropriate

    5

    Microchipping your dog is responsible and if they have been offered it for free what is the problem. To many people discard dogs, if the council has a problem then at least they are being pro-active and not draconian.

    Posted at 13:49 on 02 Dec 2008 by
    stevenhoward | Report as inappropriate

    6

    its a good idea but like fifi says, the council is on dodgy ground now and could face problems, what if there dog doesnt get found if missing....

    Posted at 10:58 on 03 Dec 2008 by
    george | Report as inappropriate

    7

    If a dog doesn't get found the odds are it may later appear at a vet's surgery, and after the vet scans the dog and types the microchip number into their computer the vet may see another name listed as the owner of that dog.

    Posted at 15:17 on 07 Dec 2008 by
    Quincy | Report as inappropriate