Dog World news archive - February 2012

Dogs dying by the hour

17 Sep 2009 08:02

This article has 9 Comment(s)

EVERY HOUR of the day one stray dog is put to sleep somewhere in the UK, according to a survey carried out by Dogs Trust.
Figures just published by the charity show that 107,228 stray and abandoned dogs were collected by local authorities over the past 12 months which is an 11 per cent increase on the previous year and also the biggest increase since records began.
Dogs Trust is blaming the hike on the 2008 change in stray dog law in England and Wales when responsibility for them moved from the police to councils.
The charity also fears that the current financial crisis may have had an impact.
More than 9,000 unclaimed stray dogs were put to sleep by local authorities during the 12 months and the charity is calling on the Government to introduce compulsory microchipping for all dogs in the UK. It hopes this will reduce the problem and help reunite owners with their lost pets and trace abandoned pets back to irresponsible owners.
In the last year 31 per cent of the strays returned to their owners were able to be reunited because they were microchipped.

Handled by councils


The annual survey showed that an average of 12 stray and abandoned dogs an hour are now handled by councils.
Each hour five are reunited with their owners, three are taken to welfare organisations, one is rehomed from the local authority kennels, two are in kennels for their seven-day holding period and one dog is put to sleep.
The largest number of strays – 18,805 – were collected in the Midlands. The North West – with 15,871 – was in second place, and Wales third with 12,232.
From a total UK figure of 6,710, the greatest number of strays were put to sleep in Northern Ireland – 4,041. Even so, this represented a 21 per cent decrease on the year before. A long way behind Northern Ireland in second place was the North West with 969.
The number of dogs put to sleep in North Scotland increased by 833 per cent; in Tyne Tees & Border by 297 per cent; the South by 285 per cent; and East and Anglia by 253 per cent.
Dogs Trust chief executive Clarissa Baldwin said: “This is the largest annual increase since our records began in 1997.
“Previously we had seen a steady decline but the latest statistics show a huge jump in the number of stray dogs both handled and put to sleep by local authorities. Some dog wardens mentioned the recession could have been a contributing factor to the increase while others cited the change in the stray dog law last April.
“We believe that the time is right to review the Control of Dogs Order and we are calling on the Government to introduce compulsory microchipping of all dogs in the UK.
“Microchipping is an essential part of being a responsible dog owner and has helped so many people become reunited with their beloved pets.”
The charity says that compulsory microchipping already has significant support in the UK. It says that more than 90 per cent of local authorities and vets and almost 90 per cent of dog owners are in favour of its introduction.
To date, 45 MPs have signed a supportive Early Day Motion for the campaign and the charity has received additional support regionally from local MPs from all three of the main parties.
Dogs Trust spends approximately £5m each year in neutering, microchipping and education programmes in the worst affected areas of the UK – Northern Ireland, North West, North East and Wales. Since the campaigns began in 1999, more than 307,000 dogs have been neutered and 228,500 have been microchipped through the charity.

You need to login to add your comment. Already registered? Log in now! Not registered? Register now!

    1

    I think any breeder who does not have a pup microchipped before going to a new home should have all registrations stopped.

    Posted at 09:53 on 17 Sep 2009 by
    Fifi | Report as inappropriate

    2

    I don't think this has anything to do with change from police to council for stray collection and everything to do with the recession and today's throw away society.

    Posted at 13:16 on 17 Sep 2009 by
    mahooli | Report as inappropriate

    3

    As I mentioned in responding to Jessica Holms column I used to work for a local authority. There is no doubt that the change in the law has put a greater workload on Councils without, in most cases, much in the way of significant resources. Councils will usually house strays in private kennels. Even if an owner appears pretty quickly a charge is usually made for a dog to be released. Some owners simply will not cover this charge.

    Posted at 13:53 on 17 Sep 2009 by
    convict 225 | Report as inappropriate

    4

    I agree convict. Also, if your dog strayed, wouldn't you contact the local authority straight away? If you cared, that is. People think that by abandoning unwanted dogs, they are giving them an opportunity to find a new family. But the figures show this is not always possible. Microchipping won't work if the owner doesn't want the dog back. What do you do with it then?

    Posted at 17:04 on 17 Sep 2009 by
    Spotty Muldoon | Report as inappropriate

    5

    The Dogs Trust themselves found that since they started chipping they had higher 'returns' then previously as people who decided they couldn't cope with their rescue anymore actually took them back to the rescue they got it from rather than pass it on due to the chipping. I think chipping is more of a deterent because you can be located unless you dump the dog and move at the same time so to a degree it does work but as with everything it isn't 100% effective.

    Posted at 09:33 on 18 Sep 2009 by
    mahooli | Report as inappropriate

    6

    I believe all breeders should permanently identify the pups they breed, but the choice of method should still e there. I would not be happy to chip young pups but have always had my pups tattooed with the National dog Tattoo register. The NDTR also always keep the breeders details and contact the breeder if there is difficulty contacting the registered owner. If my experience with new owners never transferring Kennel Club registrations and tattoo register details is anything to go by where only half change the ownership details. Also from what I hear from friends working in rescue often the chip details are not up to date either.

    Posted at 12:46 on 18 Sep 2009 by
    Brainless | Report as inappropriate

    7

    Your idea is a good one Brainless, but I wonder how many breeders would willingly accept back the waifs and strays that their buyers have abandoned? Sure, if the dog was genuinely lost, they might take on the role of holding it until it was reunited with its owner. But if the dog was dumped?

    Posted at 15:05 on 18 Sep 2009 by
    Spotty Muldoon | Report as inappropriate

    8

    Some thing that would help is if vets did not charge really large amounts of money to nueter / spay a dog 6years ago it cost me £180 to have my boy done and a bitch is even more I know that the RSPCA will help with the dogs they have homed and I think the dogs trust also has a scheme that help some people , with reduced fees this would help many people and their dogs apart from unwanted litters it also helps to prevent certian cancers

    Posted at 18:12 on 18 Sep 2009 by
    jac02 | Report as inappropriate

    9

    Also what would help these dogs is if we did not live in a throw away world it's easy come easy go attitude

    Posted at 19:10 on 19 Sep 2009 by
    jac02 | Report as inappropriate