Dog World news archive - February 2010

Write to your MP urges KC

14 May 2009 08:02

This article has 17 Comment(s)


Click here to listen

GOVERNMENT interference in the breeding of pedigree dogs is looking increasingly likely, the Kennel Club believes.
Discussions taking place as part of the Association Parliamentary Group for Animal Welfare’s (APGAW) enquiry into pedigree dog welfare is giving growing cause for concern.
Unlike the KC/Dogs Trust enquiry into the breeding of all dogs, APGAW’s relates only to pedigree animals, and the KC fears that new regulations could be imposed which, for instance, restrict breeding unless either a vet or ‘breeding panel of experts’ agree to it first.
“Some members of the APGAW enquiry are very sensible people asking very sensible questions,” said KC secretary Caroline Kisko. “But there are others who remain unconvinced by us.
“Dog people really need to take this seriously, as the likelihood of interference by the Government is, while not as high as 100 per cent certain, certainly looking more likely.”

Questioned


When questioned by members of the enquiry, the KC has stuck to its line that the principles of the Accredited Breeder Scheme should be brought in when breeding any kind of dog, whether pedigree, crossbreed or mongrel.
“Joining the ABS is the only way forward, the only way we can convince the Government,” Mrs Kisko said. “People may think that this will all go away and they will be allowed to continue as they are, but we are not going to be allowed to continue like that. APGAW can only make recommendations, but they do tend to get listened to. They could come up with something like the RSPCA suggested: a breeding panel of experts, so that no one could breed unless they refer to the panel first, or dogs having to be looked at by a vet before they are allowed to be bred from.”
The KC is approaching the Government directly by writing to all MPs asking them to support its drive to safeguard the long-term health and welfare of pedigree dogs is improved by dog shows. And it is asking exhibitors and breeders to write to their MPs too asking them to acknowledge the importance of dog showing in improving pedigree dog health.
A KC briefing, which is in the process of being sent out to MPs up and down the country, outlines the key health benefits of dog showing and the steps that the KC has taken to ensure that health is rewarded ‘first and foremost’.
Among the points raised are the importance of the revised breed Standards and judges’ education in ensuring that only healthy dogs are rewarded in the show ring; also how shows help to improve the standard of breeding and the overall health of pedigree dogs.
The letter states that there had been recent ‘strong suggestions’ that dog showing was responsible for a number of canine health problems, ‘without recourse to scientific evidence to establish the facts’.
It continues: “As more than 12,000 of your constituents are likely to have a dog, I thought you might like to know about the KC’s campaign to promote dog showing as a means of resolving any health problems related to a dog’s conformation. The KC has itself taken a number of actions to improve dog health such as establishing an independent inquiry into the health of all dogs and calling on the Government to apply the basic principles embodied in its Accredited Breeder Scheme to the breeding of all dogs in the UK.

“Not only can dog showing achieve these health improvements but also the industries surrounding the 37 general championship and 3,000 other dog shows that take place each year are an important contributor to the UK economy, both in terms of revenue and employment across a range of sectors.

In excess

“Entry fees to general championship shows alone amounted to £5.5 million last year, while Crufts 2009 brought approximately £9.3 million to the local economy and generated retail sales from trade stands during and after the event in excess of £40 million of business.”
The briefing document states: “In recent years dog showing has become the scapegoat for a number of canine health problems with little recourse by its accusers, to rigorous scientific examination of the true facts. Despite being purely a hobby for its participants, the KC believes that dog showing is one of the most effective methods for driving improvements in dog health.
“This is because it is in this forum alone (ie the world of dog shows) that breed Standards hold the authority to achieve progress. It should be noted that just some one per cent of the dogs registered with the KC will end up in the show ring at any one time but it is from the breeders and exhibitors of such dogs and the more than 700 KC registered breed clubs that the impetus for positive future change has come in the past and will come in the future.”
The briefing concludes: “The KC believes that if left to the non-showing/non-competing dog breeder or owner to eradicate canine disease caused by conformation or other problems, there will simply be no incentive for them to do so. Without the competitive showing element and the hard work of responsible breeders and breed clubs working to eradicate health problems through careful breeding, little progress will be made.”

Coincides

The call for support coincides with the close of the Birmingham National which celebrated the 150th anniversary of dog showing.
“Dog shows are part of the fabric of British society and as we celebrate the 150th year it is important that we remember that they are not only a British Institution but a very real way to improve the health and welfare of pedigree dogs,” said KC spokesman Caroline Kisko. “The KC constantly strives to ensure that it achieves this objective through educating judges about the importance of rewarding health first and continually monitoring the breed Standards, so we can be more sure than ever that dog shows are achieving this goal.
“We hope that MPs will join us in supporting dog shows, and that dog lovers will write to their MPs encouraging them to get behind the KC to recognise the importance of dog showing for pedigree dog health. Without dog shows there would be no incentive to breed healthy dogs, no forum to monitor whether this is being done and no platform to educate the breeders and owners of the future.”

You need to login to add your comment. Already registered? Log in now! Not registered? Register now!

    1

    As a Cavalier Pet Owner who has shed many ,many tears because of the MVD Heart Problem which afflicts the Cavalier Breed, .The UK Cavalier Club has just put on it's Web Site,their Prioritised List of Health Concerns within the Breed,at NO 1 is MVD.Also the Kennel Club have recently mentioned that the Biggest Killer of Cavaliers is MVD. At the recent AGM of the UK Cavalier Club ,the Cardiologist said that 50% of Cavaliers have a Heart Murmur at 5 years of age ,that it no better than it was 20 years ago. Why has this happened ,was not enough care taken by Cavalier Breeders in the past in Heart Testing their Breeding Stock.It has been known since the 1940's -50's -60's -70's that Cavaliers were suffering from Heart Trouble. I don't know what the APGAW Committee's Recomendations might be , but hopefully note will be taken by the Committee and Cavaliers' MVD Heart Problem will be being given special attention. Bet Hargreaves

    Posted at 10:15 on 14 May 2009 by
    bolshie | Report as inappropriate

    2

    Showing saved many breeds when the show "fancy" took up breeds that were no longer needed for their original purpose. Right now the dog show community must work to save our pedigree breeds all over again. We must forget the past and work all out to prove that pedigree dogs are healthly and suited to the modern world. Let the KC demand health testing, insist that all judges work to promote healthly show dogs and take the lead in thinking the unthinkable ie; planning for carefully selected outcrossing between breeds where this is the only way to improve genetic health. The KC must get ahead of the law-makers not act as a pressure group trying, Canute like, to try to hold back the tide.

    Posted at 14:16 on 14 May 2009 by
    convict 225 | Report as inappropriate

    3

    planning for carefully selected outcrossing between breeds where this is the only way to improve genetic health. well said Convict ABS should really read Abselute Bull S*** it is now a mark of any quality. For the kennel club to push this flawed and useless scheme will get them nowhere untill compulsary screening is a must in the scheme. The Kennel Club helped tosow the bad seed now they can reap a rotten harvest. Support the Kennel Club I will only do so when they actually act like grown ups and face up to the future requirements for the health of our dogs. Paul

    Posted at 16:58 on 14 May 2009 by
    neutral | Report as inappropriate

    4

    sorry but should have said NOT instead of NOW about the ABS Paul

    Posted at 16:59 on 14 May 2009 by
    neutral | Report as inappropriate

    5

    The KC believes that if left to the non-showing/non-competing dog breeder or owner to eradicate canine disease caused by conformation or other problems, there will simply be no incentive for them to do so. Without the competitive showing element and the hard work of responsible breeders and breed clubs working to eradicate health problems through careful breeding, little progress will be made.” \\\\the exact people who caused the mass NO THANKS. Paul

    Posted at 17:11 on 14 May 2009 by
    neutral | Report as inappropriate

    6

    I think, now, that the KC are pushing the ABS as it is another money making scheme. I thought at first it was a way forward but the truth of the matter is that if the KC was truely for health then health testing would be compulsory for all to enable puppies to be registered.

    Posted at 17:11 on 14 May 2009 by
    beckyess | Report as inappropriate

    7

    Sad to say this, but i have absolutely no convidence in the current KC administration. The childish backlash mentality and the paper shuffling while they wait for things to go back to their comfie normality are the reasons why. The KC are now a tarnished brand and until they offer the future puppy buyer a better product then the backyard breeders things will not improve. By better product, i don't mean a dog that might win a rossette, i mean a dog that has a reasonable chance of a happy healthy life. What we are hearing here is slightly ridiculous! The majority of dog owners in any MP's constituency will be pet owners, not show people. What has happened since Pedigree dogs exposed to assure them that buying a KC registered puppy, even from a ABS breeder will provide them with a healthy puppy?

    Posted at 17:59 on 14 May 2009 by
    Kaleta | Report as inappropriate

    8

    6. I would be interested to know how you think the KC makes money from the Accrdited Breeder Scheme?

    Posted at 18:04 on 14 May 2009 by
    Hazel | Report as inappropriate

    9

    They will make money the more people who join up, everyone has to have an affix etc etc. They will no doubt up the price of joining in the not too distant future. Besides why can't they simply make health testing compulsory for all? Please explain that. I simply don't understand why it is such an issue.

    Posted at 07:58 on 15 May 2009 by
    beckyess | Report as inappropriate

    10

    You brought up the money making by the KC! At the moment with admin and folder costs to say nothing of advertising it, I doubt the scheme breaks even.

    Posted at 09:27 on 15 May 2009 by
    Hazel | Report as inappropriate

    11

    At the risk of repeating myself, I call again for a two pronged attack on the health issues. It was not long ago that we heard the arguement that showing had little effect on the way dogs were bred and should be left alone. I'm please that arguement has been turned on it's head. Showing in some breeds rewarded unhealthy exaggeration. I see no reason why rewarding healthy dogs in the ring should not have a positive effect. Making sure show winners are healthy dogs and that health and conformation go together will encourage breeders to produce healthy animals. I see that as hitting the problem from the top down. To hit it from the bottom up is to screen all dogs for all known health problems affecting that breed before breeding. The KC should make that their stated aim and ask the law makers to sort out any legal challenges it may face in putting that into practice. Be pro-active KC, lead in this, you will get much more backing that way!

    Posted at 09:29 on 15 May 2009 by
    convict 225 | Report as inappropriate

    12

    I have mentioned the serious MVD Heart Problem afflicting the Cavalier Breed, and has done so for many years, infact about 20 years ago a Geneticist and a Health Person involved with the Cavalier Club here in the UK, trying to help in getting to grips with MVD in the Breed ,resigned in disgust because of the attitude of a number of the Cavalier Breeders.As beckyess says, at least for our Cavalier Breed ,make Heart Testing compulsary before a Mating takes place. I know beckyess mentions compulsary Health Testing for all Breeds ,but I only have knowledge of the devasting Heart Problem in the Cavalier Breed. ,Maybe it's too late now ,since it's possible that many of the Cavaliers around to-day could be Carriers of the MVD Gene/Genes.Why have the Cavalier Breeders allowed this to happen to the Breed ,the Heart Trouble has been known about since the 1940's. ? Bet Hargreaves

    Posted at 09:45 on 15 May 2009 by
    bolshie | Report as inappropriate

    13

    I'm going to repeat myself. There is nothing stopping the KC from making health testing compulsory as a requirement for registering puppies, they already refuse and restrict registrations so it's about time they did it for all. The reason they don't is because of the money not because they care about health!

    Posted at 10:47 on 15 May 2009 by
    beckyess | Report as inappropriate

    14

    Think MP's have a tad more important issues to discuss presently, especially those with fingers in the till! Some totally aggreeable comments especially those that see through the flawed ABS, its childlike in conception , fundamentally flawed throughout and does little to control real disease in k9s

    Posted at 11:05 on 15 May 2009 by
    Fifi | Report as inappropriate

    15

    Could I mention the Cavalier Breed again,there has been much talk about the SM Problem in the Breed .It's not really known at the moment how wide-spread it is, but if for Cavaliers there was Mandatory MRI Scanning on Cavalier Breeding Stock ,then the SM Problem maybe has a chance of not getting out of control as the MVD Heart Problem has seem to have happened in the Breed . Bet Hargreaves

    Posted at 09:07 on 18 May 2009 by
    bolshie | Report as inappropriate

    16

    There should be mandatory health screening for all breeds. If the KC truely wants to ensure we do not have unwelcome governmental legislation then make health testing compulsory and show up all the puppy farmers/cross breeders/byb's for what they really are.

    Posted at 08:02 on 19 May 2009 by
    beckyess | Report as inappropriate

    17

    "new regulations could be imposed which, for instance, restrict breeding unless either a vet or ‘breeding panel of experts’ agree to it first". So if there is a panel and I buy a puppy from a breeder whose dogs the panel has said are ok to breed from.... And my puppy has a health problem...... Who would I sue under the "sale of goods" act as my puppy is not suitable for the purpose for which it was bred and sold to me? The panel or the breeder or both?

    Posted at 19:20 on 23 May 2009 by
    Pauline | Report as inappropriate